Accountability
Sources, credits and corrections.
Good publishing shows readers where claims and images came from, and makes uncertainty visible.
Research standard
Primary documents, standards bodies, public institutions and peer-reviewed research are preferred for factual claims. Personal experience may illuminate a subject but is not presented as universal evidence. Health and trauma material is written conservatively and does not replace qualified care.
Image standard
The visual archive uses reusable material from Wikimedia Commons. Licence names and creators are reproduced from source metadata. Select an image below to visit its original file page and verify the latest attribution requirements.
- File:C Hello World Program.pngEsquivalience · CC0
- File:Software App showing flow based programming and properties (SAM Labs).jpgYm Tees · CC BY-SA 4.0
- File:Code on computer monitor (Unsplash).jpgMarkus Spiske markusspiske · CC0
- File:Skeleton programming code.jpgMonky2020 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- File:Atmega8 programmer box1.jpgFDominec · CC BY-SA 3.0
- File:Wikimedia Conference Berlin - Developer meeting (7739).jpgRaimond Spekking · CC BY-SA 4.0
- File:Chris Hecker - Game Developers Conference 2010.jpgOfficial GDC · CC BY 2.0
- File:Apprendre à programmer avec Python 32.pngOriginal uploader was Tavernier at fr.wikibooks · CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrections
Pages are dated by publication rather than presented as timeless. When evidence changes, the wording should change with it. No anonymous testimonials, invented institutional claims or synthetic survivor quotations are published as fact.